For SaaS CEOs and operating leaders
Keep everyone building the same plan
Decided turns recurring private 1:1 AI voice check-ins into a weekly leadership brief showing priority drift, missing decisions, and ownership—while leaders still have time to act.
- A private 1:1 — one person, one AI, never a group call
- Leadership sees the patterns, never the raw transcript
- Advisory only — your people make every decision
Everyone agreed, then each team built a different plan
A leadership message can sound clear and still leave each team with a different next step. The split stays invisible until the weekly review, when it has already become a missed commitment.
Everyone holds a piece. No one sees the whole plan.
Sales
The pitch changes, but the handoff still assumes the old priority.
Product
The roadmap keeps the old assumption because nobody named an owner or a date for the decision.
Customer Success
Customer Success promises one thing while Sales and Product are already planning another.
Misalignment is expensive long before you can see it
No dashboard shows the gap forming. Independent research keeps measuring what it costs once it lands.
See the full cost of misalignment61%
Strategy rarely reaches daily execution
61% of senior executives told the Economist Intelligence Unit their firms often struggle to bridge strategy and its day-to-day implementation.
PMI / Economist Intelligence Unit, Why Good Strategies Fail$1.2Tper year
Poor communication is a trillion-dollar tax
Grammarly and The Harris Poll modeled the cost of poor communication at up to $1.2 trillion a year for U.S. businesses.
Grammarly / Harris Poll, The State of Business Communication58%
Most of the day goes to work about work
Asana estimated 58% of knowledge-worker time goes to coordination, status updates, and searching for information rather than skilled work.
Asana, Anatomy of Work 2023
Hear what the status update leaves out
People often say more out loud than they type. Clara asks the people closest to the work about the blocker no one escalated and the decision that never found an owner.
The useful answer often starts one question later.
Clara stays focused on the work, asks one question deeper, and keeps each conversation within the agreed visibility boundary.
Meet Clara, the AI who runs the check-inSee the drift no single team can see
Decided lines up what each team said—priorities, blockers, decisions, owners, dates—and shows where the plans no longer match, before the gap reaches a metric.
A dashboard shows movement. Decided compares the plans behind it.
Private check-in
One participant joins a scheduled private voice check-in. The AI interviewer asks what changed, what is blocked, and what needs a decision.
Compare the answers
Decided structures each answer by priority, blocker, decision, owner, date, and assumption, then compares the patterns across teams.
Leadership review
Leadership reviews the weekly brief, adds context, and decides which follow-up to route and to whom.
Alignment is not a dashboard or a good manager
Communication tools, dashboards, and manager 1:1s each show part of the plan. None compares how that plan reached the people doing the work. Decided starts with private conversations, then shows where priorities, owners, and assumptions no longer match.
- 01
Surveys capture only the questions you asked
Private voice check-ins can preserve the context around a blocker, decision, commitment, or unclear message.
- 02
Dashboards show the miss after it happens
Decided compares how teams describe the plan before the miss appears in the metric.
- 03
Manager 1:1s depend on one manager
Clara uses the same check-in structure with everyone, every week, so leadership can compare patterns across teams without depending on one manager's phrasing or memory.
A clear boundary for candid participation
Designed for alignment, not evaluation. Participants know why the check-in happens, what is captured, who can see each routed output, and how it will be used. Leadership reviews synthesized patterns rather than employee scores or unrestricted raw transcripts.
Visibility rules are set before rollout.
See how visibility worksWhat Decided maps
- Priorities, blockers, decisions, and commitments
- Owners, dates, message gaps, and assumption gaps
- Patterns that need leadership context or follow-up
- Reviewed context routed under rollout visibility rules
What Decided does not do
- Group calls, surveys, or hidden monitoring
- Employee surveillance or performance scoring
- Automated employment decisions
- Unrestricted raw transcript access
Know where the plan forked before the review
Open the week with what changed, which blockers repeat, and who is missing context—instead of rebuilding status from Slack, docs, and manager memory.
Alignment map
See where teams appear to be working from different versions of the plan.
Decision memory
Keep the decision with its owner, date, and the context behind it.
Follow-up loop
Route the agreed context to the people who can act, then revisit the issue in the next check-in.
The point is not another report. It is a decision someone can make.
Bring one operating review
Bring a QBR, launch, reorg, or weekly review. We will map who should take part, what leadership needs to learn, and what each participant can see.
Book demoUse it before the plan hardens
Start with the meeting where leadership needs a better answer, then return to the same questions each week.
Start with one operating question, not the whole company.
Before a QBR or board review
Walk in with current blockers, missing decisions, and assumption gaps already structured.
During a launch, reorg, or GTM change
See where the message translated differently before teams commit to different plans.
Inside the weekly operating review
Bring a current brief instead of rebuilding status from Slack, docs, and manager memory.
Start with one Alignment Scan
It covers one leadership question and one participant group, with visibility rules agreed before the first check-in. Leadership then decides whether to continue week to week.
See how the Alignment Scan worksQuestions to answer before rollout
Where should the first rollout start?
Start with one operating question and one participant group tied to a real review, launch, reorg, or GTM change. That makes the visibility boundary and the usefulness of the output concrete before expanding the cadence.
Who participates and how do check-ins work?
Leaders, managers, and employees close to the work join scheduled private voice check-ins with one AI interviewer. The rollout should explain why the check-in happens and how output is used.
What should participants know before the first check-in?
They should understand why the check-in is happening, what is captured, who can see each routed output, how it will be used, and whether they can review captured notes.
What does Clara ask about?
The check-in stays close to the work: what changed, what is blocked, which decision is missing, who owns the next step, what date matters, and which assumption may no longer match across teams.
What reaches the leadership review?
Leadership receives synthesized patterns and routed context around changed priorities, repeated blockers, missing decisions, owners, dates, commitments, and message or assumption gaps.
Does leadership see raw conversations?
Leadership works from synthesized patterns and routed context, not unrestricted raw transcript access. Visibility rules are set before rollout.
Who decides what happens after the brief?
People do. Leadership reviews the brief, adds operating context, decides which follow-up is appropriate, and routes that context to the people who can act.
Is Decided used for performance scoring?
No. Decided is for operating clarity and advisory follow-up. It is not hidden monitoring, employee surveillance, performance scoring, or an automated employment decision system.
Bring the review already on your calendar
We will map the first participant group, the visibility rules, and whether an Alignment Scan or recurring weekly brief is the better starting point.
No rollout to plan first — one review is a practical place to start.
